Category Archives: Transnational Litigation

Subscribe to Transnational Litigation RSS Feed

Pursuing and Responding to Discovery Requests Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782

Neil PopovicShin HahnBy Neil Popovic and Shin Hahn on Posted in Transnational Litigation
As discussed in a previous blog post, an interested party in a foreign or international proceeding may apply to a United States District Court for discovery from an individual or corporation who resides or is found in the district. This blog describes the procedural steps for pursuing or responding to discovery requests under 28 U.S.C. … Continue Reading

The US Supreme Court Finds that International Organizations’ Immunity Is On Par With That of Foreign Governments

Helene GogadzeBy Helene Gogadze on Posted in Transnational Litigation
The International Organizations Immunities Act of 1945  (“IOIA”) grants international organizations such as the World Bank and the World Health Organization the “same immunity from suit and every form or judicial process as is enjoyed by foreign governments.”  However, at the time the IOIA was enacted, foreign governments enjoyed virtually absolute immunity from suit, while … Continue Reading

US Law Allows Discovery for Foreign Proceedings

Neil PopovicShin HahnBy Neil Popovic and Shin Hahn on Posted in Transnational Litigation
Fearing the burdens of U.S. court litigation, many foreign companies doing business with American counter-parties insist on forum selection clauses that call for resolution of disputes outside of U.S. courts, either in foreign courts or international arbitration. High on the list of objectives may be avoiding U.S.-style discovery, which can justifiably strike fear into the … Continue Reading

Contracts with Foreign Companies May Require a Rewrite

Hwan KimNeil PopovicBy Hwan Kim and Neil Popovic on Posted in Transnational Litigation
A recent California case may force companies doing business with foreign entities to reconsider—and maybe rewrite—their contracts. In Rockefeller Tech. Invs. (Asia) VII v. Changzhou Sinotype Tech. Co., No. B272170, 2018 WL 2455092 (Cal. App. June 1, 2018), the California Court of Appeal held that parties may not contract around the formal service requirements of … Continue Reading
LexBlog